• Users Online: 287
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
SELECTED SUMMARIES
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 31  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 24-25

Prophylactic platelet transfusion in dengue: Blanket of false comfort?


Department of Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Dr RML Hospital New Delhi, C-322, Yojana Vihar, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication15-Oct-2018

Correspondence Address:
Mohammad Ali
Department of Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Dr RML Hospital New Delhi, C-322, Yojana Vihar, New Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-258X.243409


How to cite this article:
Sharma A, Ali M. Prophylactic platelet transfusion in dengue: Blanket of false comfort?. Natl Med J India 2018;31:24-5

How to cite this URL:
Sharma A, Ali M. Prophylactic platelet transfusion in dengue: Blanket of false comfort?. Natl Med J India [serial online] 2018 [cited 2018 Nov 17];31:24-5. Available from: http://www.nmji.in/text.asp?2018/31/1/24/243409



Lye DC, Archuleta S, Syed-Omar SF, Low JG, Oh HM, Wei Y, Fisher D, Ponnampalavanar SL, Wijaya L, Lee LK, Ooi E-E, Kamarulzaman A, Lum LC, Tambyah P, Leo Y. (Institute of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Infectious Diseases, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore; University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Changi General Hospital, Singapore; Singapore Clinical Research Institute, Singapore; and Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore.) Prophylactic platelet transfusion plus supportive care versus supportive care alone in adults with dengue and thrombocytopenia: A multicenter, open-label, randomised, superiority trial. Lancet 2017;389:1611–18.


  Summary Top


This study was an open-label, randomized trial, which included adult patients with dengue in Singapore and Malaysia, to assess the utility of platelet transfusions in those with significant thrombocytopenia.

Admitted adults, ≥21 years of age, in whom a diagnosis of dengue was confirmed by either polymerase chain reaction, non-structural protein 1 positivity or serology and with a platelet count of <20 000/ cmm were included in the study. Patients with significant active bleeding, pregnant or lactating women, those with a history of peptic ulcer or with anticoagulant use or those with a long-standing organic disease were excluded from the study. In addition, extremely sick patients who were not expected to live beyond 48 hours and those with a history of an adverse reaction to transfusion of blood or its products were also excluded from the study. Eligible patients (n=372) were randomized to two groups. The transfusion group received platelet transfusion and supportive care and the control group was managed with supportive measures in the form of intravenous fluids and antipyretics. Patients in the transfusion group were transfused 4 units of platelets every day, until the platelet counts were >20 000/ cmm, in addition to supportive care. Since none of these patients had active bleeding from any site at the time of randomization, this strategy in the transfusion group was termed prophylactic platelet transfusion. Baseline blood investigations were done in all patients including haemogram and kidney and liver function tests. In addition, coagulation profile and a chest X-ray were also done.

Patients were monitored for bleeding, serositis and shock. In the transfusion group, platelet counts were done at 1, 12 and 24 hours after transfusion. Packed cell volume (PCV) was also monitored and an increase by 20% or more was considered indicative of plasma leakage. Based on these clinical and laboratory monitoring measures, various events in the study groups were measured. One of these was the number of days in which the baseline platelet count of 20 000/ cmm or less increased to ≥50 000/cmm. The number of days of hospitalization was also noted. Major adverse events such as sepsis, adverse reaction to platelet transfusion, transfer to intensive care unit and severe bleeding manifestations and death were assessed.

In the transfusion group, by the fourth day of enrolment, almost all patients had platelet counts >50 000/cmm. Four units of platelets were transfused to the patients per day in the transfusion group and an average of 4.71 units of platelets was transfused per patient. No significant difference was found in bleeding rates, including severe bleeding, between the two groups. The number of patients with evidence of plasma leakage was also comparable. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of dengue shock syndrome between the two groups. The number of days of hospitalization was also not significantly different between the groups. The transfusion group had significantly higher number of adverse events compared to the control group, of which approximately 69% of events were attributable to the transfusion itself.

The authors concluded that the strategy of prophylactic platelet transfusion did not provide an advantage to supportive care in terms of risk of bleeding, hospital stay or prevention of non-haemorrhagic complications of dengue-like shock. Instead, platelet transfusion was associated with more adverse events as compared to those who were managed conservatively.


  Comment Top


Dengue has become a major global health problem.[1] Thrombo-cytopenia which commonly accompanies dengue has become an inappropriate target of treatment.[2] There is a constant fear of increased risk of bleeding manifestations with low platelet counts which lead to inappropriate prophylactic platelet transfusions. This strategy actually does not serve any purpose and adds to the risk as evidenced by various studies. Further, prophylactic platelet transfusions increase the burden on the healthcare system by increasing the requirement of blood products during epidemics of dengue.

Studies in both children and adults have shown that platelet counts are not related to the risk of bleeding manifestations.[3],[4],[5] On the other hand, abnormality in platelet aggregation was noticed in dengue patients with bleeding in a large study from New Delhi,[4] suggesting that qualitative defects in platelet functioning rather than the number of platelets is responsible for bleeding manifestations. Other factors such as old age,[6] deranged coagulation profile,[7] higher PCV,[7] leucocytosis[8] and female gender[8] have been shown to be associated with increased risk of bleeding. A large retrospective study from Singapore has shown that prophylactic platelet transfusion is not helpful in preventing bleeding or in increasing platelet counts.[3]

A study from Bengaluru found that prophylactic platelet transfusion delayed the recovery of patients, in terms of increment of platelet counts and the time to discharge.[9] In another study of children from Malaysia, patients receiving prophylactic platelet transfusion had a significantly higher risk of developing pulmonary oedema.[10] The risk of transfusion-related adverse effects such as anaphylaxis, transmission of blood-borne infections and acute lung injury always exists with transfusion of blood products, including platelets.

This large randomized study was done on 372 adult patients with dengue and showed that prophylactic platelet transfusion had no added advantage over supportive care. Women, who are at higher risk of bleeding, constituted just 24% of the study population.[8] Severe bleeding was present only in a minority of patients, so the effect of prophylactic platelet transfusion on severe bleeding events could not be assessed. Another study from Singapore measured outcomes similar to the current study but retrospectively.[11] It found that patients who were transfused prophylactically had a shorter duration of fever, higher pulse rate and more neutrophil percentage as compared to those who were not transfused. Further, platelet increment after 24 hours of admission was higher in the transfusion group.

The British Committee for Standards in Haematology has recommended a platelet count <10 000/cmm for prophylactic platelet transfusion in those with no other risk factors which would increase the risk of bleeding.[12] In high-risk groups, clinical practice guidelines from Singapore recommend a platelet transfusion threshold of 20 000/cmm.[13] There is an urgent need for randomized controlled trials which would help in the formulation of guidelines regarding platelet transfusion in dengue. This would reduce the huge variability in the practice of clinicians worldwide in terms of indications for platelet transfusion.[14]

Implications for India

Dengue is endemic in India, and every year we see outbreaks that concern healthcare providers, municipalities and the general population. Because of a huge population load, healthcare facilities are always overloaded with patients during times of outbreaks of dengue. Thrombocytopenia, which is a common feature of dengue fever, has been inappropriately correlated with bleeding risk, both by doctors and by the general public.

Due to the constant fear of major bleeding associated with uncorrected thrombocytopenia, pressure from patients and their family members on doctors for platelet transfusion and lack of formal guidelines on prophylactic platelet transfusion results in frequent, inappropriate transfusion of blood products. Further, because of increasing assaults on doctors by patients and their relatives these days, doctors tend to play it safe by transfusing platelets, even in the absence of strong indications. This adds up to a severe paucity of blood products during the peak dengue season all over the country. This deprives the more deserving sick patients with other diseases of blood products.

This study highlights the need to understand that platelet counts should not be the target of treatment in uncomplicated dengue and should not be used as a tool to assess disease severity. Other clinical and laboratory parameters such as blood pressure, pulse pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, consciousness level, third space fluid loss, haematocrit and total and differential leucocyte counts should guide treatment because the presence of breathlessness and impaired consciousness level have been shown to be factors predicting mortality in patients with dengue.[5] Patients dying of dengue haemorrhagic fever were found to be having lower levels of haematocrit compared to survivors, in a tertiary hospital-based setting in Delhi.[4] The results of this study should be made widely known not only to healthcare providers and planners but also to the lay public. It would go a long way in ending the platelet count-centred care of patients with dengue.

Conflicts of interest. None declared



 
  References Top

1.
Guzman MG, Halstead SB, Artsob H, Buchy P, Farrar J, Gubler DJ, et al. Dengue: A continuing global threat. Nat Rev Microbiol 2010;8:S7-S16.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Lee VJ, Lye DC, Sun Y, Fernandez G, Ong A, Leo YS, et al. Predictive value of simple clinical and laboratory variables for dengue hemorrhagic fever in adults. J Clin Virol 2008;42:34-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Lye DC, Lee VJ, Sun Y, Leo YS. Lack of efficacy of prophylactic platelet transfusion for severe thrombocytopenia in adults with acute uncomplicated dengue infection. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48:1262-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Sharma S, Sharma S, Mohan A, Wadhwa J, Dar L, Thulkar S, et al. Clinical profile of dengue heamorrhagic fever in adults during 1996—outbreak in Delhi, India. Dengue Bull 1998;22:20-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Jain S, Mittal A, Sharma SK, Upadhyay AD, Pandey RM, Sinha S, et al. Predictors of dengue-related mortality and disease severity in a tertiary care center in North India. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017;4:ofx056.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Wichmann O, Hongsiriwon S, Bowonwatanuwong C, Chotivanich K, Sukthana Y, Pukrittayakamee S, et al. Risk factors and clinical features associated with severe dengue infection in adults and children during the 2001 epidemic in Chonburi, Thailand. Trop Med Int Health 2004;9:1022-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Tee HP, How SH, Jamalludin AR, Safhan MN, Sapian MM, Kuan YC, et al. Risk factors associated with development of dengue haemorrhagic fever or dengue shock syndrome in adults in hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan Kuantan. Med J Malaysia 2009;64:316-20.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Chamnanchanunt S, Kanagaraj D, Thanachartwet V, Desakorn V, Rojnuckarin P. Early predictors of clinically significant bleeding in adults with dengue infection. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2012;43:890-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Prashantha B, Varun S, Sharat D, Murali Mohan BV, Ranganatha R, Shivaprasad, et al. Prophyactic platelet transfusion in stable dengue fever patients: Is it really necessary? Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 2014;30:126-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Lum LC, Abdel-Latif Mel-A, Goh AY, Chan PW, Lam SK. Preventive transfusion in dengue shock syndrome—is it necessary? J Pediatr 2003;143:682-4.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Lee TH, Wong JG, Leo YS, Thein TL, Ng EL, Lee LK, et al. Potential harm of prophylactic platelet transfusion in adult dengue patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2016;10:e0004576.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
British Committee for Standards in Haematology, Blood Transfusion Task Force. Guidelines for the use of platelet transfusions. Br J Haematol 2003; 122:10-23.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Koh BC, Chong LL, Goh LG, Iau P, Kuperan P, Lee LH, et al. Ministry of health clinical practice guidelines: Clinical blood transfusion. Singapore Med J 2011 ;52: 209-18.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Whitehorn J, Rodriguez Roche R, Guzman MG, Martinez E, Gomez WV, Nainggolan L, et al. Prophylactic platelets in dengue: Survey responses highlight lack of an evidence base. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2012;6:e1716.  Back to cited text no. 14
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Summary
Comment
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed118    
    Printed5    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded34    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]