EVERYDAY PRACTICE: Diabetes Mellitus 304
Treatment of diabetes mellitus: Beyond glycaemic control
RANJIT UNNIKRISHNAN I., V.
MOHAN
INTRODUCTION
Type 2 diabetes mellitus has emerged as the leading metabolic
disorder worldwide, affecting more than 350 million
individuals as of 2007. India is the ‘diabetic capital’ of the
world, with 41 million people afflicted with the disease. The
clinical importance of diabetes lies mainly in its propensity
to produce macrovascular and microvascular complications,
leading to cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease,
retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy and foot problems, which
account for considerable morbidity and mortality throughout
the world.
Two landmark clinical trials—the Diabetes Control and
Complications Trial (DCCT) and the United Kingdom Prospective
Diabetes Study (UKPDS)—established beyond doubt the importance
of tight glycaemic control in preventing or delaying the
complications of diabetes. Maintaining good control of blood
sugar, as evidenced by a glycated haemoglobin level of <7%,
can reduce the risk of diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy to
negligible levels. However, in these trials, a similar
impressive reduction was not found in the case of
macrovascular complications, namely, cardiovascular and
cerebrovascular disease. This leads one to presume that a
comprehensive programme of risk reduction, looking beyond just
glycaemic control, would be needed in order to reduce
cardiovascular events in people with diabetes. This is of
particular relevance to India as Asian Indians have been found
to have an extremely high prevalence of cardiovascular
disease.
THE CONCEPT OF GLOBAL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK
An individual’s risk of developing cardiovascular disease
depends on the presence or absence of a number of risk
factors, hyperglycaemia being only one of them. These factors
act either additively or multiplicatively to determine the
global cardiovascular risk of the individual. The most
important of these risk factors have been included in the
definition of the metabolic syndrome. These are central
obesity, dyslipidaemia, fasting hyperglycaemia and
hypertension. In addition to these conventional risk factors,
newer markers such as C-reactive protein and platelet
activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) have also been the subject of
intense study. No less important are behavioural factors such
as smoking and physical activity. Any programme to reduce
cardiovascular risk must target all these factors if it is to
succeed.
We focus on the control of ‘conventional’ risk factors in
people with diabetes, as these have been found to contribute
to >90% of the cardiovascular burden of risk.
LIPIDS
As a result of defects in insulin secretion and insulin
action, patients with type 2 diabetes are at risk of
developing an atherogenic lipid profile. The main features of
the so-called ‘diabetic dyslipidaemia’ are:
-
Elevated levels of triglycerides
-
Low levels of high density lipoprotein (HDL)
cholesterol
-
High, normal or low levels of low density
lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, associated with an increase
in the highly atherogenic small dense LDL particles.
The lipid profile should be checked at
least annually in persons with diabetes, and more often if not
at the target levels (Table I).
Lipid management aimed at lowering LDL cholesterol, raising
HDL cholesterol and lowering triglycerides has been
shown to reduce macrovascular disease
and mortality in people with type 2
diabetes, particularly in those who have had prior
cardiovascular events. Recent trials
suggest that aggressive lowering of LDL to <70 mg/dl can lead
to significant reduction in cardiovascular events. The
following points may be kept in mind when treating diabetic
dyslipidaemia.
-
Any patient with dyslipidaemia should be
offered a trial of therapeutic lifestyle change. Exceptions
include those with prior cardiovascular or cerebrovascular
disease and an LDL >100 mg/dl, or those at risk of acute
complications of hyper-lipidaemia (e.g. acute pancreatitis
from hypertriglyceridaemia). In such people, pharmacotherapy
should be initiated at the same time as therapeutic
lifestyle change.
-
Improvement in glycaemic control can in
itself lead to improvement in certain lipid levels (e.g.
triglycerides).
-
Patients who fail to respond to a
therapeutic lifestyle change are candidates for drug
therapy. The primary goal of drug therapy is to reduce LDL
to target levels. Statins are the drug of choice for this
purpose. Other drugs that lower LDL
include nicotinic acid, ezetimbe, bile acid sequestrants
and fenofibrate.
-
If the HDL is low, niacin may be added to
the regimen.
-
In those with elevated triglycerides and
normal cholesterol levels, a fibrate would be the drug of
choice.
TABLE I. Targets for lipid levels in people
with diabetes
| Lipid level
(mg/dl) |
People with
diabetes |
| without vascular
complications |
with vascular complications |
| Triglyceride |
<150 |
<120 |
| Cholesterol |
|
|
| Total |
<200 |
<180 |
| Low density lipoprotein |
<100 |
<70 |
| High density lipoprotein |
>45 |
>45 |
TABLE II.
Doses, side-effects and contraindications of commonly used
lipid-lowering drugs
| Class
of drug |
Effect
on lipids |
Drug
and daily dose |
Side-effects |
Contraindications |
HMG-CoA
reductase
inhibitors (statins) |
¯TC
¯¯LDL |
Simvastatin (5–40 mg)
Atorvastatin (5–80 mg)
Rosuvastatin (5–20 mg) |
Myopathy, altered liver function
tests, nausea, vomiting |
Pregnancy, impaired liver
function |
Fibric
acid derivatives
(Fibrates) |
¯¯TG
HDL |
Gemfibrozil (900–1500 mg)
Bezafibrate (600–800 mg)
Fenofibrate (67–200 mg) |
Myopathy, altered liver function
tests, increase in serum creatinine
(fenofibrate) |
Pregnancy, impaired liver
function, gallstones |
| Niacin |
¯TC
¯TG
HDL |
Niacin
(375 mg–6 g) |
Flushing, activation of peptic ulcer,
hyperglycaemia |
Pregnancy, hepatic disease, active peptic ulcer |
|
Ezetimibe |
¯LDL |
Ezetimibe (10 mg) |
Diarrhoea, abdominal pain |
Pregnancy |
HMG CoA hydroxymethyl
glutaryl coenzyme A TC total cholesterol TG triglycerides
LDL low density lipoprotein HDL high density lipoprotein
-
Combination therapy with a statin and a
fibrate or statin and
niacin, may be efficacious for those needing
treatment for
all 3 lipid fractions, but this combination is associated
with an increased risk of elevated
liver enzymes and myopathy. Data are not available on
reduction of vascular events with such combinations.
The usual doses, contraindications and
side-effects of the commonly used lipid-lowering agents are
listed in Table II.
In addition to their cholesterol-lowering effect, statins
also have other beneficial (‘pleiotropic’) effects on
atherogenesis (Table III).
HYPERTENSION
Hypertension is twice as common in persons with diabetes
compared with those who do not have diabetes. In addition to
contributing to cardiovascular risk, hypertension is also a
major risk factor for stroke as well as in the development and
progression of diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy.
Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of
lowering blood pressure
to <140 mmHg systolic and <80 mmHg diastolic in
people with diabetes. Epidemiological analyses show that
blood pressure >115/75 mmHg is
associated with increased
rates of cardiovascular events and mortality in
people with
diabetes. Therefore, a target blood pressure of <130/80 mmHg
is desirable in all persons with diabetes. In those with
proteinuria, a goal of 125/75 mmHg should be set.
The blood pressure should be measured at every follow up
visit. Those who have a systolic blood pressure >130
mmHg or diastolic
blood pressure 80 mmHg should have a confirmation of their
blood pressure on a separate day.
Lifestyle modifications include reducing sodium intake and
body weight; increasing
consumption of fruits, vegetables and low-fat
dairy products; exercise, moderation in consumption of alcohol
and increasing activity
levels can be tried for 3 months in those
presenting with a systolic blood pressure of 130–139 mmHg or a
diastolic blood pressure of 80–89 mmHg (pre-hypertension as
per the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee
[JNC-7]). Those who fail to respond to lifestyle modification
or those presenting with a systolic blood pressure >140
mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure >90 mmHg should be
started on drug therapy. The following points should be kept
in mind while prescribing antihypertensive agents for people
with diabetes.
-
Most patients need more than one drug to
achieve target levels of blood pressure.
- Initial drug therapy should be with a class of drugs
proven to reduce cardiovascular events (angiotensin-converting
enzyme [ACE] inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers [ARB],
beta-blockers, diuretics and calcium-channel blockers).
TABLE III. Pleiotropic effects of statins
- Improvement of endothelial
dysfunction
- Increased nitric oxide
bioavailability
- Antioxidant properties
- Inhibition of inflammatory responses
- Stabilization of atherosclerotic
plaques
|
-
All regimens should contain an ACE
inhibitor or an ARB.
Not only have these agents been shown to reduce the risk of
cardiovascular disease, but they also prevent and retard the
development of diabetic nephropathy.
-
A thiazide diuretic can be added if
needed to achieve the target blood pressure levels.
-
Blood pressure should be reduced
gradually in elderly patients.
-
Check the blood pressure in the supine
and erect positions separately if orthostatic hypotension is
suspected.
The dosage, side-effects and
contraindications of the 5 common classes of antihypertensive
drugs are listed in Table IV.
ANTIPLATELET AGENTS
Aspirin is recommended for all people with diabetes as primary
or secondary prevention for cardiovascular events. Several
trials have shown an up to 30% reduction in myocardial
infarction rates and 20% reduction in stroke rates when
aspirin is used.
-
Aspirin is indicated for secondary
prevention in people with diabetes with a history of
cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease.
-
It is also recommended as primary
prevention in people with type 2 diabetes who are above 40
years of age and in those who have additional cardiovascular
risk factors such as family history, smoking, hypertension
or dyslipidaemia.
-
Aspirin is not recommended for people
below the age of
21 years due to the risk of Reye syndrome.
-
Doses of aspirin from 75 to 325 mg/day
have been used. It is best to treat with lower doses in
order to minimize side-effects.
-
Those who are unable to tolerate aspirin
may be candidates for other antiplatelet agents (e.g.
clopidogrel).
-
Combination therapy with aspirin and
clopidogrel may be considered in those with severe and
progressive cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease.
TABLE IV. Doses, side-effects and contraindications of
commonly used antihypertensive drugs
| Class of drug |
Drug and daily dose |
Side-effects |
Contraindications |
| Diuretics |
Hydrochlorothiazide (25–50
mg)
Indepamide (1.5–2.5 mg) |
Hypokalaemia,
hyponatraemia,
hyperuricaemia, hyperglycaemia |
Anuric renal failure,
hepatic failure,
hypercalcaemia, pregnancy |
| Beta-blockers |
Atenolol (50–200 mg)
Metoprolol (100–450 mg)
Bisoprolol (5–10 mg)
Nebivolol (2.5–5 mg) |
Bradycardia, fatigue |
Bronchial asthma, heart
block,peripheral vascular disease,severe heart failure |
| Angiotensin-converting
enzyme inhibitors |
Enalapril (2.5–40 mg)
Ramipril (1.25–20 mg)
Lisinopril (2.5–40 mg)
Perindopril (2–4 mg) |
Dry cough, hyperkalaemia,
renal failure |
Bilateral renal artery
stenosis, pregnancy |
| Angiotensin receptor
blockers |
Losartan (25–100 mg)
Irbesartan (150–300 mg)
Valsartan (40–160 mg)
Telmisartan (20–80 mg) |
Headache
Dizziness
Hyperkalaemia |
Bilateral renal artery
stenosis, pregnancy |
Calcium-channel blockers
(dihydropyridines
are preferred
as antihypertensives) |
Dihydropyridines
Amlodipine (2.5–10 mg)
Nifedipine (5–40 mg) |
Headache, pedal oedema,
flushing, palpitation |
Cardiogenic shock, acute
myocardial infarction |
Non-dihydropyridines
Verapamil (40–480 mg)
Diltiazem (60–240 mg) |
Nausea, constipation |
Congestive cardiac failure,
heart block |
CESSATION OF SMOKING
Smoking is the most important modifiable cause of premature
death. A large body of evidence links smoking with heightened
risk of premature morbidity and mortality. In persons with
diabetes, not only does smoking accelerate the development of
macrovascular complications, but it has also been shown to
adversely affect microvascular complications such as
nephro-pathy. Cessation of smoking is one of the most
cost-effective means of reducing the cardiovascular risk in
people with diabetes.
A history of tobacco use should be asked for and those who
smoke should be strongly advised to quit. Counselling for
cessation of smoking should be made an integral part of
diabetes care.
SCREENING FOR COMPLICATIONS OF DIABETES
Complications of diabetes account for most
of the morbidity and mortality due to the disease. An
important aspect of diabetes care beyond glycaemic control is
to screen for these complications, so as to detect them at a
stage when effective treatment can be instituted.
Comprehensive screening for these complications includes the
following:
-
Regular assessment of cardiovascular risk
factors as described above.
-
Diagnostic cardiac stress testing in individuals with
symptoms of cardiovascular disease or those with abnormal
resting ECG. The role of stress testing in asymptomatic
individuals with normal ECG is controversial.
-
Estimation of microalbuminuria, serum
creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)
at least annually, starting from 5 years after diagnosis for
those with type 1 and at diagnosis for those with type 2
diabetes.
-
Annual dilated retinal examinations
starting at diagnosis in type 2 diabetes and at 5 years
after diagnosis in type 1 diabetes.
-
Detailed foot examination with assessment
of sensation and pedal pulses at each visit.
Any of these screening procedures should
be performed more frequently if any abnormality is detected.
CONCLUSION
Type 2 diabetes has reached epidemic
proportions in India. The large number of people with diabetes
in India translates into a huge population at risk for
complications of diabetes. The most important aspect of
diabetes care is the maintenance of tight glycaemic control.
Nevertheless, to be successful, a diabetes care programme must
look beyond glycaemic control and address each of the
cardiovascular risk factors prevalent in the community. Such
an approach alone can bring about a long-lasting reduction in
the prevalence of complications of diabetes.
|