Table I. Responses to individual questions
in the survey |
Name 3 indexing services |
Two correct responses
One correct response
No response |
12
15
5 |
Name 3 indexed Indian medical journals |
Three correct responses
Two correct responses
One correct response
No correct response |
18
4
7
3 |
List components to be included in the cover page |
Correct
Incorrect |
4
28 |
List components of a structured abstract |
Complete correct response
Incomplete but correct
None |
3
21
8 |
Name the source of keyword terms |
‘Medical Subject Headings’
Index Medicus
None |
6
8
18 |
Name 4 parts of a scientific paper |
All four correctly named
Not correctly named
All correct |
30
2
3 |
| measurement
Provide abbreviations for names of 7 medical journals |
All correct
5–6 correct responses
3–4 correct responses
1–2 correct responses
None |
0
4
9
14
5 |
Proofreading marks for 7 types of corrections |
All correct
5–6 correct responses
3–4 correct responses
1–2 correct responses
None
|
2
5
8
6
11 |
Indicate whether the following statements are true or false: |
|
|
1. References may be used in the abstract |
correct responses
incorrect responses |
29
3 |
2. All the important words in the
title should be
mentioned as keywords |
correct responses
incorrect responses |
15
17 |
3. References are cited in alphabetical order |
correct responses
incorrect responses |
22
10 |
4. Tables should be typed in the
manuscript where
they are to appear in the text |
correct responses
incorrect responses |
23
9 |
Discussion
Our data show that medical and biomedical researchers in
India have very limited knowledge of various aspects of
scientific writing, including uniform requirements for
submission of manuscripts, and of the usual conventions
followed. This is particularly disturbing since most of
the respondents had published one or more papers in the
past and were engaged in research. We were unable to find
any published data on the subject.
This lack of writing skills may inhibit our scientists from
reporting their research findings. Also, it may reduce the
chances of acceptance of their manuscripts. We therefore
believe that there is a need to include formal teaching of
scientific writing in medical and research training. In fact,
our institution runs such a course for its students annually,
though attendance at the course is optional.
In the absence of published data, we were unable to compare
Indian biomedical scientists with those in other parts of
the world. It may be interesting to study this aspect in
other geographical regions and to conduct a similar survey
in the future to look at time trends in the awareness of
writing skills.
Though our data may not be generalizeable, since the workshop
participants may have preferentially included those who lacked
writing skills and hence decided to attend the workshop,
they provide useful information.
Acknowledgement
We are indebted to Late Professor S. R. Naik, former Head
of the Department of Gastroenterology at our institution,
who organized the workshop on scientific writing and encouraged
us to conduct this study.
10 March 2004 |
Rakesh Aggarwal
Department of Gastroenterology
Vinay K. Kapoor
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology
Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences
Lucknow 226014
Uttar Pradesh
India
rakesh@sgpgi.ac.in |